[Skip to Content]

Judging Criteria


Judging for Student Classics will be based on:

  • content,
  • creativity,
  • production quality,
  • technical excellence
  • and appropriateness for the declared audience. 

An overall score for this entry will be provided with the following values: 

5 points: It is clear why the project was created and what the situation on which the project/element is based. A description of research is optional, but should be included if applicable. The results or impact this had in relation to the overall project or ongoing program is clearly outlined.

4 points: It is somewhat clear why the project was created. For campaigns, some overview of objectives, budgets, resources used, timeline used and audience included. The results or impact this had in relation to the overall project is outlined, but some components are missing.

3 points: Half of the elements above are identified within the entry.

2 points: It is not very clear why the project was created. For campaigns, almost no overview of objectives, budgets, resources used, timeline used and audience are included. Little information given on results or impact in relation to the overall project.

1 point: A majority of elements listed above are not represented in the entry.